|
Much criticism has been thrown towards 'life critical
illness insurance' companies lately, due to claims that they are selling policies were the terms and
conditions are not fully understood by the insured. It is generally perceived that the companies are
manipulating customers into buying policies which promise them 100% protection regardless of the
circumstances of the conditions developed.
If anyone believes this, then they only have themselves to blame. Lets face it, since when has any
type of insurance been easy? Especially an insurance that may have to pay tens of thousands?
There is always small print, exclusions, terms and conditions. They should nearly be read before
anything else in my opinion.
Many providers have even lowered the amount of clients they refuse
in order to gain some more reliability and provide confidence for their customers. An example of this would be
Standard Life, who have lowered their refusal rate to approximately 15%. Scottish Provident have also taken a
similar approach and have lowered their rate to 11%. The total being paid out by this insurer has reached £344 000
000 since the year 1996.
Most people who get refused claims have themselves to
blame. I can acknowledge that insurance companies can be a pain, but they do have to cover their own back and
stick to their rules. Refusal reasons in the past have mainly consisted of non-disclosure of specific
information required by the insurer such as family history. Another factor would simply be the payout being
excluded due to certain terms and conditions that is simply not covered on the policy. What's covered on one
policy may not be covered in another policy. Even more so, a condition that is covered by most companies may
have different terms and conditions associated with the policy and any claim that may be
made.
However, in today's age, if someone has cancer, cannot
work, cannot make money or anything, the sum paid out from the critical illness policy may not last very long
at all. The expenses required in today's society couldn't possibly up keep their usual standard of life. So
regardless, there will still have to be a lot of sacrifice of personal
capital.
It would be worth your while to look at other policies such as
an income protection. This policy would payout if you broke your leg and you couldn't work for a while.
the payments would last until you returned to work.
It will also pay up to your full wage depending on the policy taken
out.
This is not the same as a critical illness policy and
neither would it be covered.
FAQ's
|